Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
SupportforinternationalhumanrightshasbecomeanentrenchedpartofCanadax19snationalmythology.DespitethegravityofhumanrightsissuesandhowCanadaappearstochampionvariouscausestheroleofhumanrightsinCanadianforeignpolicyhasreceivedsurprisinglylittlescrutiny.InWhyCanadaCaresAndrewLuibringsclaritytothisunder-exploredpartofCanadax19sidentity.LuiprovidesachronologicalandtheoreticallygroundedanalysisofhumanrightsinCanadianforeignpolicysince1945.Hearguesthatwhilethecountryhasrarelyprovenwillingtosacrix1ccematerialadvantageforinternationalhumanrightscausesCanadahaspursuedhumanrightsaspartofabroaderattempttocementindividualrightsasthecornerstoneofCanadianfederalismandaimedtomitigatefrictionbetweenthecountryx19sdiversesocialgroups.InotherwordsinternationalhumanrightswereimplementedasawaytoexpressandestablishanexpansivevisionofwhatCanadiansocietyshouldlooklikeinordertosurviveandx1dourishasacoherentandunix1cedpoliticalentity.Thex1crstcomprehensivesingle-authoredbookonthetopicWhyCanadaCaresuncoversthefoundationsofCanadax19sinternationalhumanrightspoliciesandoffersinsightintotheirpossibilitiesandlimits.AndrewLuiisassistantprofessorofpoliticalscienceatMcMasterUniversity.TheUNhasadoptedax1cresponsibilitytoprotectx1dmandateforhumanitarianinterventionincivilwarsx13butthereisnoinstitutionalbasisforcarryingoutthatmandate.PatriciaMarchakarguesthatunlesswould-beintervenershaveanunderstandingoflocalissuesagentswhospeaklocallanguagesandamilitaryforcefullypreparedtoundertakebothpeacefulandmilitarymissionsonshortnoticeUNandotherattemptstointerveneareunlikelytosucceed.WhileUN-sponsoredinternationalcriminalcourtshavebeensuccessfulinobligingleaderstoacceptresponsibilityfortheiractionsduringbitterinternalwarsMarchakarguesthattheymaynotbethebestmeansofbringingtruthandreconciliationtosurvivors.Basedontheprincipleofindividualresponsibilitytheyarenotdesignedtodealwithcollectivecrimesagainsthumanityandgenocidenoraretheygoodinstrumentsfordealingwiththebreakdownofsocieties.Bringingtogetherherownx1celdinterviewsdocumentarymaterialandsecondarysourcesMarchakcriticallyassessestherecenthistoryofinter-nationalinterventionsandcriminalprosecutions.SheexaminesthreecasesindetailCambodiaRwandaandtheformerYugoslaviainitscurrentformsofBosniaandSerbiaconsiderstheirinternationalcontextpriortoandduringinternalwarsandarguesthateachcasehastobeunderstoodinitsowncontextandhistoryx13thereisnocommonpatternandnoeasyx1cxthatcouldmendbrokensocietiesafterthewars.PatriciaMarchak1936x132010professoremeritusattheUniversityofBritishColumbiawastheauthorofseveralbooksincludingLoggingtheGlobe.27MQUPSPRING2012POLITICALSCIENCEINTERNATIONALRELATIONSSPECIFICATIONSMay2012978-0-7735-3997-632.95ACDNpaper978-0-7735-3996-995.00SCDN95.00SUS62.00cloth6x9304ppWhyCanadaCaresHumanRightsandForeignPolicyinTheoryandPracticeandrewluiDebunkingcommonmythsaboutCanadax19sinternationalhumanrightspolicies.GENOCIDESTUDIESCONFLICTSTUDIESnewinpaperNoEasyFixGlobalResponsestoInternalWarsandCrimesAgainstHumanitypatriciamarchakAcritiqueoftheglobalresponsetowarcrimesandgenocideduringandfollowingthebreakdownofsocietyinCambodiaRwandaandYugoslavia.SPECIFICATIONSStudiesinNationalismandEthnicConx10ictMay2012978-0-7735-4019-424.95TCDN24.95TUS15.99paper6x9400pp4maps